Public school systems play a crucial role in shaping local economies, influencing everything from property values to workforce development. The economic impact of local public schools extends far beyond education, affecting businesses, government budgets, and community well-being. Below are key ways in which public schools contribute to local economic health.
- Boosting Property Values and Municipal Revenue
A strong public school system increases demand for housing in the district, driving up property values. Studies consistently show that homes in high-performing school districts command higher prices than comparable homes in weaker districts. Higher property values, in turn, generate more property tax revenue for local governments, which can be reinvested in infrastructure, public safety, and other community services.
Additionally, businesses are more likely to establish themselves in areas with well-regarded schools, knowing that educated communities attract skilled workers and stable families. This creates a positive feedback loop where better schools lead to economic growth, which then further supports school funding.
- Workforce Development and Economic Competitiveness
Public schools are the primary source of skilled labor for local industries. By providing foundational education, vocational training, and college preparation, schools ensure that businesses have access to qualified employees. Areas with strong school systems tend to have lower unemployment rates and higher average incomes because educated workers are more productive and adaptable to changing job markets.
Investments in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) programs, career and technical education (CTE), and partnerships with local businesses further enhance workforce readiness. Companies often consider school quality when deciding where to locate, as they need a pipeline of talent to sustain operations.
- Direct Employment and Local Spending
Public schools are among the largest employers in many communities, providing jobs for teachers, administrators, custodians, and support staff. These employees spend their salaries locally, supporting restaurants, retail stores, and service providers. The multiplier effect means that every dollar spent on school payroll circulates through the economy multiple times, stimulating additional business activity.
Beyond salaries, schools also contribute to local economies through construction projects (e.g., building new facilities or renovating old ones), purchasing supplies from area vendors, and contracting services like transportation and food supply. These expenditures create jobs and generate tax revenue.
- Reducing Long-Term Public Costs
Quality education correlates with lower crime rates, reduced reliance on social welfare programs, and better public health outcomes. Students who graduate from strong school systems are less likely to require government assistance, engage in criminal activity, or face chronic unemployment. This reduces the burden on taxpayers, who would otherwise fund prisons, healthcare for the uninsured, and social services.
Early childhood education programs, in particular, have been shown to yield high long-term returns by improving graduation rates and future earnings while decreasing incarceration costs.
- Attracting and Retaining Families and Businesses
Families with children prioritize school quality when choosing where to live. Communities with reputable schools experience population growth, which sustains local businesses and services. Conversely, declining school performance can lead to outmigration, shrinking the tax base and harming economic vitality.
Similarly, corporations evaluating relocation opportunities assess school systems to ensure employees will have access to good education for their children. A weak school system can deter investment, while a strong one can attract high-paying jobs and stimulate economic diversification.
Conclusion
The local public school system is not just an educational institution but a cornerstone of economic stability and growth. By enhancing property values, developing a skilled workforce, employing residents, reducing public costs, and attracting businesses, schools create a thriving economic ecosystem. Policymakers and community leaders must recognize that investing in education yields broad economic benefits, making it one of the most impactful ways to ensure long-term prosperity.
The following report contains those school districts that are completely or partially within the county. The school districts are sorted in a left to right order based on the number of students that are estimated to live in the county, although they may actually attend a school outside the county boundary. Except where noted all figures are for the entire disctrict population and not just that portion that are in the county.
Where available, the district's name contains a link to that district's website.
|
Chisago Lakes School District |
Hastings Public School District |
|
White Bear Lake School District |
|
Forest Lake Public School District |
|
Mahtomedi Public School District |
|
North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale School District |
|
Stillwater Area Public School District |
|
South Washington County School District |
|
Grade Span of Agency Number of Schools Total Classroom Teachers Student/Teachers
Prekindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 PK thru 12 Students Ungraded Students Adult Education and Other Students Special Ed IEP Students Total Students
White Black Asian Hispanic Native American Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Undefined or Multiple Races
Prekindergarten Teachers Kindergarten Teachers Elementary Teachers Secondary Teachers Ungraded Class Teachers Total FTE Teachers
Elementary School Counselors Secondary School Counselors School Counselors Total Counselors
School Administrators School Administrative Support Staff Instr. Coord. and Super. to Staff Student Support Services Staff Librarians/media specialists Library/Media Support Staff School Psychologists Paraprofessionals/Instructional Aides Total School Staff
LEA Administrators LEA Administrative Support Staff Total LEA Staff
All Other Support Staff Total Other Staff
|
PK-12
29
1,144
17.21
649
1,269
1,343
1,395
1,379
1,467
1,441
1,404
1,398
1,441
1,468
1,520
1,523
1,663
19,360
0
0
325
19,685
11,464
1,891
2,522
1,888
58
13
1,524
53
58
520
484
29
1,144
0
33
0
33
51
66
74
308
19
10
40
325
819
25
31
130
283
283 |
PK-12
16
444
19.14
222
508
602
565
600
593
594
625
623
614
691
678
677
776
8,368
0
0
130
8,498
6,270
462
431
680
18
6
501
23
26
217
166
12
444
1
12
0
13
18
42
21
169
4
0
12
130
374
18
15
54
99
99 |
PK-12
23
742
14.58
705
751
710
694
665
731
702
698
684
675
865
903
906
944
10,633
0
0
182
10,815
2,801
1,932
3,059
1,800
64
8
969
30
36
312
287
77
742
0
19
0
19
38
54
28
310
0
0
9
182
593
20
22
70
215
215 |
PK-12
6
193
16.84
30
185
196
203
206
215
233
244
237
268
297
289
298
293
3,194
0
0
56
3,250
2,555
153
103
152
7
1
223
10
13
71
83
16
193
0
8
0
8
7
11
7
31
1
4
6
56
116
10
8
25
20
20 |
PK-12
14
268
21.84
124
363
339
414
386
412
408
391
478
429
504
491
491
533
5,763
0
0
90
5,853
4,496
176
435
326
28
1
301
0
19
127
121
1
268
0
0
0
0
1
23
0
87
2
0
0
90
202
4
22
26
176
176 |
PK-12
25
522
16.72
385
588
614
609
613
617
612
595
569
625
656
677
709
680
8,549
0
0
178
8,727
5,857
572
725
739
36
6
614
27
27
234
225
9
522
0
13
0
13
22
65
30
151
6
6
14
178
442
8
0
38
148
148 |
PK-12
12
249
16.71
105
260
283
276
288
276
285
310
291
292
381
369
338
341
4,095
0
0
67
4,162
3,309
124
62
297
19
2
282
10
14
96
111
18
249
1
7
0
8
11
18
13
49
0
4
5
67
153
12
12
37
58
58 |
PK-12
11
227
15.07
29
237
266
255
248
248
237
248
246
269
276
260
280
232
3,331
0
0
89
3,420
3,009
21
57
103
16
0
125
3
15
98
82
29
227
0
6
0
6
9
8
9
50
1
4
3
89
164
7
8
23
39
39 |
Sources: STI: PopStats and STI: Colossus
|