| – |
Public school systems play a crucial role in shaping local economies, influencing everything from property values to workforce development. The economic impact of local public schools extends far beyond education, affecting businesses, government budgets, and community well-being. Below are key ways in which public schools contribute to local economic health.
- Boosting Property Values and Municipal Revenue
A strong public school system increases demand for housing in the district, driving up property values. Studies consistently show that homes in high-performing school districts command higher prices than comparable homes in weaker districts. Higher property values, in turn, generate more property tax revenue for local governments, which can be reinvested in infrastructure, public safety, and other community services.
Additionally, businesses are more likely to establish themselves in areas with well-regarded schools, knowing that educated communities attract skilled workers and stable families. This creates a positive feedback loop where better schools lead to economic growth, which then further supports school funding.
- Workforce Development and Economic Competitiveness
Public schools are the primary source of skilled labor for local industries. By providing foundational education, vocational training, and college preparation, schools ensure that businesses have access to qualified employees. Areas with strong school systems tend to have lower unemployment rates and higher average incomes because educated workers are more productive and adaptable to changing job markets.
Investments in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) programs, career and technical education (CTE), and partnerships with local businesses further enhance workforce readiness. Companies often consider school quality when deciding where to locate, as they need a pipeline of talent to sustain operations.
- Direct Employment and Local Spending
Public schools are among the largest employers in many communities, providing jobs for teachers, administrators, custodians, and support staff. These employees spend their salaries locally, supporting restaurants, retail stores, and service providers. The multiplier effect means that every dollar spent on school payroll circulates through the economy multiple times, stimulating additional business activity.
Beyond salaries, schools also contribute to local economies through construction projects (e.g., building new facilities or renovating old ones), purchasing supplies from area vendors, and contracting services like transportation and food supply. These expenditures create jobs and generate tax revenue.
- Reducing Long-Term Public Costs
Quality education correlates with lower crime rates, reduced reliance on social welfare programs, and better public health outcomes. Students who graduate from strong school systems are less likely to require government assistance, engage in criminal activity, or face chronic unemployment. This reduces the burden on taxpayers, who would otherwise fund prisons, healthcare for the uninsured, and social services.
Early childhood education programs, in particular, have been shown to yield high long-term returns by improving graduation rates and future earnings while decreasing incarceration costs.
- Attracting and Retaining Families and Businesses
Families with children prioritize school quality when choosing where to live. Communities with reputable schools experience population growth, which sustains local businesses and services. Conversely, declining school performance can lead to outmigration, shrinking the tax base and harming economic vitality.
Similarly, corporations evaluating relocation opportunities assess school systems to ensure employees will have access to good education for their children. A weak school system can deter investment, while a strong one can attract high-paying jobs and stimulate economic diversification.
Conclusion
The local public school system is not just an educational institution but a cornerstone of economic stability and growth. By enhancing property values, developing a skilled workforce, employing residents, reducing public costs, and attracting businesses, schools create a thriving economic ecosystem. Policymakers and community leaders must recognize that investing in education yields broad economic benefits, making it one of the most impactful ways to ensure long-term prosperity.
The following report contains those school districts that are completely or partially within the county. The school districts are sorted in a left to right order based on the number of students that are estimated to live in the county, although they may actually attend a school outside the county boundary. Except where noted all figures are for the entire disctrict population and not just that portion that are in the county.
Where available, the district's name contains a link to that district's website.
| |
| Bloomington Public School District |
| Belle Plaine Public School District |
|
| Jordan Public School District |
|
| New Prague Area Schools |
|
| Burnsville Public School District |
|
| Lakeville Public School District |
|
| Shakopee Public School District |
|
| Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools |
|
Grade Span of Agency Number of Schools Total Classroom Teachers Student/Teachers
Prekindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 PK thru 12 Students Ungraded Students Adult Education and Other Students Special Ed IEP Students Total Students
White Black Asian Hispanic Native American Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Undefined or Multiple Races
Prekindergarten Teachers Kindergarten Teachers Elementary Teachers Secondary Teachers Ungraded Class Teachers Total FTE Teachers
Elementary School Counselors Secondary School Counselors School Counselors Total Counselors
School Administrators School Administrative Support Staff Instr. Coord. and Super. to Staff Student Support Services Staff Librarians/media specialists Library/Media Support Staff School Psychologists Paraprofessionals/Instructional Aides Total School Staff
LEA Administrators LEA Administrative Support Staff Total LEA Staff
All Other Support Staff Total Other Staff
|
PK-12
13
508
17.49
149
572
604
615
575
620
648
672
657
667
748
749
776
725
8,777
0
0
110
8,887
6,472
553
501
580
89
10
572
20
26
185
153
124
508
0
13
0
13
31
43
32
139
8
8
8
110
345
19
18
69
97
97 |
PK-12
14
519
15.02
136
435
467
492
484
500
545
583
522
598
692
754
741
729
7,678
0
0
117
7,795
3,753
1,153
821
1,259
82
4
606
9
26
199
227
58
519
0
14
0
14
26
29
35
127
4
8
6
117
316
12
11
58
77
77 |
PK-12
20
745
16.55
231
774
862
936
861
868
878
885
860
917
965
951
982
1,051
12,021
0
0
308
12,329
8,303
938
864
1,047
51
12
806
15
40
359
325
6
745
10
4
0
14
34
67
44
214
9
0
18
308
651
25
21
90
174
174 |
PK-12
20
527
14.67
450
562
532
564
552
551
510
494
442
509
563
518
607
740
7,594
0
0
139
7,733
2,224
2,149
494
2,065
50
12
600
23
36
247
186
35
527
1
13
0
14
28
30
27
135
3
5
7
139
347
18
32
76
127
127 |
PK-12
9
260
15.96
104
251
262
277
255
317
295
325
296
329
336
346
325
354
4,072
0
0
77
4,149
3,711
43
44
139
11
0
124
14
15
120
105
6
260
0
8
0
8
8
28
2
49
1
2
5
77
170
19
8
29
92
92 |
PK-12
4
121
15.49
40
118
129
132
121
124
134
135
125
138
167
166
120
177
1,826
0
0
48
1,874
1,391
58
27
220
12
4
114
6
6
47
56
6
121
0
2
0
2
5
8
4
24
0
0
2
48
87
8
2
14
20
20 |
PK-12
7
86
18.33
39
119
100
127
109
94
99
128
123
126
111
119
134
113
1,541
0
0
36
1,577
1,286
41
19
112
4
0
79
7
6
40
30
3
86
0
0
0
0
4
7
4
13
1
1
0
36
62
7
2
13
10
10 |
PK-12
23
731
14.45
421
656
667
702
671
647
707
658
742
744
877
892
898
1,012
10,294
0
0
265
10,559
4,481
1,839
592
2,395
56
8
923
40
36
320
252
83
731
0
23
0
23
34
62
59
222
4
9
13
265
609
39
45
142
201
201 |
|