Public school systems play a crucial role in shaping local economies, influencing everything from property values to workforce development. The economic impact of local public schools extends far beyond education, affecting businesses, government budgets, and community well-being. Below are key ways in which public schools contribute to local economic health.
- Boosting Property Values and Municipal Revenue
A strong public school system increases demand for housing in the district, driving up property values. Studies consistently show that homes in high-performing school districts command higher prices than comparable homes in weaker districts. Higher property values, in turn, generate more property tax revenue for local governments, which can be reinvested in infrastructure, public safety, and other community services.
Additionally, businesses are more likely to establish themselves in areas with well-regarded schools, knowing that educated communities attract skilled workers and stable families. This creates a positive feedback loop where better schools lead to economic growth, which then further supports school funding.
- Workforce Development and Economic Competitiveness
Public schools are the primary source of skilled labor for local industries. By providing foundational education, vocational training, and college preparation, schools ensure that businesses have access to qualified employees. Areas with strong school systems tend to have lower unemployment rates and higher average incomes because educated workers are more productive and adaptable to changing job markets.
Investments in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) programs, career and technical education (CTE), and partnerships with local businesses further enhance workforce readiness. Companies often consider school quality when deciding where to locate, as they need a pipeline of talent to sustain operations.
- Direct Employment and Local Spending
Public schools are among the largest employers in many communities, providing jobs for teachers, administrators, custodians, and support staff. These employees spend their salaries locally, supporting restaurants, retail stores, and service providers. The multiplier effect means that every dollar spent on school payroll circulates through the economy multiple times, stimulating additional business activity.
Beyond salaries, schools also contribute to local economies through construction projects (e.g., building new facilities or renovating old ones), purchasing supplies from area vendors, and contracting services like transportation and food supply. These expenditures create jobs and generate tax revenue.
- Reducing Long-Term Public Costs
Quality education correlates with lower crime rates, reduced reliance on social welfare programs, and better public health outcomes. Students who graduate from strong school systems are less likely to require government assistance, engage in criminal activity, or face chronic unemployment. This reduces the burden on taxpayers, who would otherwise fund prisons, healthcare for the uninsured, and social services.
Early childhood education programs, in particular, have been shown to yield high long-term returns by improving graduation rates and future earnings while decreasing incarceration costs.
- Attracting and Retaining Families and Businesses
Families with children prioritize school quality when choosing where to live. Communities with reputable schools experience population growth, which sustains local businesses and services. Conversely, declining school performance can lead to outmigration, shrinking the tax base and harming economic vitality.
Similarly, corporations evaluating relocation opportunities assess school systems to ensure employees will have access to good education for their children. A weak school system can deter investment, while a strong one can attract high-paying jobs and stimulate economic diversification.
Conclusion
The local public school system is not just an educational institution but a cornerstone of economic stability and growth. By enhancing property values, developing a skilled workforce, employing residents, reducing public costs, and attracting businesses, schools create a thriving economic ecosystem. Policymakers and community leaders must recognize that investing in education yields broad economic benefits, making it one of the most impactful ways to ensure long-term prosperity.
The following report contains those school districts that are completely or partially within the county. The school districts are sorted in a left to right order based on the number of students that are estimated to live in the county, although they may actually attend a school outside the county boundary. Except where noted all figures are for the entire disctrict population and not just that portion that are in the county.
Where available, the district's name contains a link to that district's website.
|
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District |
John Swett Unified School District |
|
Martinez Unified School District |
|
Pittsburg Unified School District |
|
Antioch Unified School District |
|
West Contra Costa Unified School District |
|
San Ramon Valley Unified School District |
|
Mount Diablo Unified School District |
|
Grade Span of Agency Number of Schools Total Classroom Teachers Student/Teachers
Prekindergarten Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 PK thru 12 Students Ungraded Students Adult Education and Other Students Special Ed IEP Students Total Students
White Black Asian Hispanic Native American Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Undefined or Multiple Races
Prekindergarten Teachers Kindergarten Teachers Elementary Teachers Secondary Teachers Ungraded Class Teachers Total FTE Teachers
Elementary School Counselors Secondary School Counselors School Counselors Total Counselors
School Administrators School Administrative Support Staff Instr. Coord. and Super. to Staff Student Support Services Staff Librarians/media specialists Library/Media Support Staff School Psychologists Paraprofessionals/Instructional Aides Total School Staff
LEA Administrators LEA Administrative Support Staff Total LEA Staff
All Other Support Staff Total Other Staff
|
KG-12
52
1,252
23.77
0
2,833
2,299
2,336
2,382
2,378
2,338
2,252
2,383
2,265
1,842
1,815
1,946
2,287
29,356
0
0
399
29,755
8,086
994
3,879
12,583
31
207
3,534
0
119
723
410
0
1,252
18
11
1
30
86
144
9
34
15
0
42
399
721
16
106
131
334
334 |
KG-12
37
1,262
23.43
0
2,336
1,741
1,872
1,858
2,124
2,043
2,242
2,310
2,405
2,468
2,537
2,565
2,734
29,235
0
0
336
29,571
9,366
489
13,974
2,639
98
75
2,589
0
112
724
426
0
1,262
27
27
1
55
70
149
8
52
14
0
49
336
671
18
66
92
441
441 |
KG-12
54
1,190
21.87
0
2,592
1,920
1,988
2,040
2,143
1,942
1,961
1,614
1,619
1,746
1,810
2,025
2,175
25,575
0
0
450
26,025
2,628
3,100
3,995
13,997
55
143
1,614
0
129
684
377
0
1,190
11
25
2
38
85
139
24
61
1
0
51
450
786
24
89
136
600
600 |
KG-12
25
720
21.22
0
1,289
981
1,119
1,019
1,115
1,140
1,167
1,131
1,145
1,115
1,219
1,205
1,389
15,034
0
0
246
15,280
1,428
3,471
1,435
7,637
81
228
739
0
59
430
231
0
720
19
10
2
31
58
94
0
8
0
0
18
246
424
15
48
64
314
314 |
KG-12
13
494
21.94
0
887
695
746
722
730
777
751
827
827
873
873
911
1,090
10,709
0
0
127
10,836
449
1,653
825
7,064
23
138
551
0
42
280
172
0
494
11
11
2
24
33
64
23
8
0
0
10
127
242
7
71
101
197
197 |
KG-12
9
174
21.90
0
373
270
282
288
295
294
291
259
262
274
282
278
323
3,771
0
0
40
3,811
1,655
86
294
1,185
8
17
523
0
16
103
55
0
174
2
5
2
9
12
14
7
5
0
0
4
40
75
2
10
19
57
57 |
KG-12
4
62
20.13
0
114
78
95
82
94
88
103
81
81
98
110
82
114
1,220
0
0
28
1,248
153
162
243
520
9
7
122
0
7
33
22
0
62
0
2
0
2
4
6
1
2
0
0
2
28
42
1
7
9
37
37 |
KG-12
18
606
21.86
0
1,276
904
933
919
1,000
936
949
948
939
973
1,064
1,065
1,144
13,050
0
0
199
13,249
5,219
190
2,245
4,179
30
28
1,152
0
59
348
199
0
606
4
9
3
16
33
79
3
23
0
0
21
199
355
9
44
56
217
217 |
Sources: STI: PopStats and STI: Colossus
|